FC 27 Review
FC 27
👍 FC 27 pros and cons
👍 Pros
- Improved features career Mode
- Pretty visuals display
- Refined gameplay
- Clear text camera
- Good soundtrack speakers
👎 Cons
- The grounds mode software & AI
- No cross play connectivity
- Slow printing speed performance
- Low page yields battery Life
- Uninspired and frustrating gameplay
🎯 Who This Product Is For
Reviewer recommendations for different target audiences and use cases.
💰 Value for Money Analysis
Most reviewers feel the price is hard to justify, citing high running costs and heavy microtransactions as major drawbacks.
13 of 24 sources commented on price or value.
📊 What Reviewers Say — Feature by Feature
10 features discussed across 24 sources. Each score blends what reviewers said about that feature with the overall score, so a feature with few mentions stays close to the overall verdict.
🔄 Worth Upgrading?
Reviewers are split on whether to upgrade from the previous model, noting that the new features like The Grounds and tactical changes are minor additions.
3 of 24 sources compared it directly with the EA Sports FC 26.
- separating Authentic and Competitive gameplay
- paying more attention to Career Mode
- Introduces The Grounds social hub
- New cornering system
- Overhauled transfer system
- new corner-taking system
- modifications to My Tactics
- brand-new open-world online mode called The Grounds
Only 2 reviewers gave a clear upgrade verdict (1 say stay put, 1 say it depends), too few to call it either way.
🔀 Rivals to compare
- NBA 2K (named by 3 of 24) [rival] New open-world social hub is similar to The City The Grounds attempts to rival The City
- Brother MFC-J1360DW (named by 1 of 24) [rival] Offers better print quality, higher page yields, automatic duplex printing, and an automatic document feeder.
- Epson Expression Home XP-4200 (named by 1 of 24) [rival] Produces sharper documents and more detailed photos with automatic duplex and borderless printing.
- FC 26 (named by 1 of 24)
- Football Manager (named by 1 of 24) [rival] Transfer system is not quite on that level
- eFootball (named by 1 of 24) [rival] Falls short due to rigid and gacha-like gameplay Reviewers favoured FC 27 for gameplay.
Reasons are the reviewers' own. Spellings of the same product are merged.
🛒 Is it right for you?
✅ Buy this if…
- You have limited space and need a compact printer
- Your printing needs are very light and occasional
- You primarily need a flatbed scanner for basic documents
- You want a more social football experience
⚠️ Skip this if…
- You print frequently and want low running costs
- You need automatic double-sided printing or a document feeder
- You plan to print high-quality photos
- You only want to play matches without managing systems
🔍 Claims vs real life
| Claim | Claimed | Measured by reviewers | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Life | 6,000 mah | reviewer's call, no figure given | Beats the claim |
| Display Brightness | 810 nits | not measured | Not independently tested |
| Page Yield Black | 160 pages | not measured | Not independently tested |
| Page Yield Color | 69 pages | not measured | Not independently tested |
Claims are the manufacturer's figures as quoted by reviewers. Measured values are what reviewers recorded themselves; test conditions differ between sources.
🔋 Real-World Battery
| Measurement | Result |
|---|---|
| Battery Life (drain) | 56% (one review) [UK] |
⚠️ Things to Check Before Buying
- Confirmed by reviewers: NFC.
⚠️ Known problems
Reported by one source (not confirmed)
- Attacking intelligence and off ball runs are very problematic (major · unresolved · 1 source)
- Extremely long and buggy matchmaking queues (major · 1 source)
- Horrific bloatware out of the box with some apps throwing adverts into notifications (major · workaround · 1 source)
- Persistent connection issues (major · 1 source)
- Persistent input delay during matches (major · unresolved · 1 source)
- Persistent network and connection issues (major · 1 source)
- Poor server connection (major · unresolved · 1 source)
- All music and background noise cut out entirely while wandering the HUB. (moderate · unresolved · 1 source)
- CPU pathing and defensive logic break down (moderate · 1 source)
- Connections to the events in The Grounds can be flaky (moderate · unresolved · 1 source)
Reviewers generally recommend this for its stellar career mode and display, but the experience is tempered by poor value and technical inconsistencies.
Most-named alternative: NBA 2K (named by 3 of 24 sources)
Nerd corner
Feature-by-feature chart, measurements, specs and the score maths. Skip this part if you only want the answer.
Technical note: Performance is mixed, with UK reviewers measuring a 56% battery drain during 12-hour video loops. Printing and scanning speeds are limited to 4.5 ppm and 1 ppm respectively.
⚙️ Speed and Benchmarks
| Measurement | Result |
|---|---|
| printing speed | 4.5 ppm (one review) |
| scanning speed | 1 ppm (one review) |
🔬 Technical takeaway
- Battery Life (drain): 56% (one review) [UK].
- Printing speed: 4.5 ppm (one review).
- Scanning speed: 1 ppm (one review).
Numbers come from the reviewers' own tests and spec lists. Test conditions differ between sources.
⚡ Where Reviewers Disagreed
- Value for Money: 4 praised it, 6 criticised it, 3 were mixed (13 sources evaluated it).
- Performance: 4 praised it, 3 criticised it, 3 were mixed (10 sources evaluated it).
- Battery Life: 2 praised it, 1 criticised it (3 sources evaluated it).
🧮 How We Got This Score
In short: each of the 24 reviews is turned into a 0 to 10 number, stronger evidence counts for more, and the numbers are averaged.
- 7 reviews gave their own numeric score, and those count extra. The others are scored from their overall tone.
- First impressions and reviews without hands-on testing count less.
- If 80%+ of reviews lean the same way, the score moves by 0.5. This time: 0 (no direction reached 80% agreement).
- 54% of reviews lean mixed, and scores are close together (spread 1.4). Agreement: Low.
- How we got there: score 6.8/10, value signal 4.7/10 from 13 reviews, evidence moderate (24 reviews, 9 hands-on).
- Reviews are dated Oct 2025 to Oct 2026.
The arithmetic, for the curious
| Review type | Reviews | Avg value | Total weight | Value × weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Numeric reviewer score | 7 | 7.1 | 10.50 | 74.10 |
| Strongly positive review | 1 | 8.5 | 1.00 | 8.50 |
| Mildly positive review | 6 | 7.5 | 5.70 | 42.75 |
| Mixed review | 10 | 5.0 | 4.85 | 24.25 |
| All reviews | 24 | 22.05 | 149.60 |
Raw average = 149.60 ÷ 22.05 = 6.8. Consensus adjustment 0 gives the final 6.8.
Calculated in code from structured data, with no manual adjustments.
How much to trust this
What these conclusions are based on
Based on 24 usable reviews: 9 hands-on, 1 first impressions, 7 with a numeric score, 2 with measured results. Evidence strength: moderate.
Versions covered: Black; PC; Xbox Series X; 4GB RAM + 128GB Storage; PlayStation 5; Nintendo Switch 2. Reviews used different storage sizes and colours. That doesn't change the verdict, but check the one you're buying.
Reviewer recommendations: 6 recommended, 4 conditional, 2 not recommended.
How sources were chosen: every matching review in our collection is used, newest first; 35 were left out because they were about a different product or version.
No source rated it negatively, so the weak spots listed on this page are where the real differences show up.
Reviewers who gave a numeric score averaged 7.1/10, ranging from 5.0 to 8.5.
📚 Sources Analysed
20 of 24 reviews could be matched to a site (19 in total).
Reviews by market: Europe 2 · India 1 · UK 1 · unknown 20. Prices, mileage and range figures follow each reviewer's own market.
Last updated: 11 Oct 2026 · based on 24 reviews dated Oct 2025 – Oct 2026.
PLG_CONTENT_IMAGEGALLERY_ERROR_NO_IMAGES